01
Project implementation and delivery
Follow climate and development projects from commitments through procurement, implementation, monitoring, and reported delivery.
Project implementation →Independent intelligence, analysis and decision support for climate finance
Following the record
across climate finance.
Climate Probity brings together project information, counterparties, institutional records and public sources across climate and development finance. We help institutions and other stakeholders understand what the available record establishes, identify material risks and information gaps, and make better-informed decisions.
Analysis directs attention. Evidence and professional judgment determine the conclusion.
Selected evidence themes
02
Results and impact credibility
Test whether reported results and impact claims are supported by the underlying project evidence.
Results and impact →
03
Financial flows and use of funds
Trace how development finance moves through projects, implementing entities, contractors, and counterparties, and whether that use is supported by the record.
Financial flows →
04
Data quality and reporting integrity
Compare project reporting across records to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and weaknesses in data quality or transparency.
Data integrity →
05
Safeguards and social risk
Examine safeguards, stakeholder impacts, and environmental and social risks across project delivery.
Safeguards and risk →
06
Monitoring, verification and assurance
Review monitoring systems, verification processes, assurance records, and the evidence supporting reported performance.
Monitoring and assurance →Built for scrutiny
Our work rests on source traceability, transparent review, qualified human judgment and proportional interpretation. The aim is to produce analysis that is accurate, defensible and useful for the decisions it is intended to support.
Read the standards →Source traceability
Link every substantive output to identifiable source records.
Transparent review logic
Make the path from record to review question or finding clear and reviewable.
Proportionate interpretation
Match language and conclusions to the strength and completeness of the evidence.
Human expert review
Apply context, professional judgment, and relevant local or sector knowledge.
Clear analytical scope
State what the evidence supports, what remains uncertain, and what warrants further review.
What has been demonstrated.
What is being strengthened.
What comes next.
View the roadmap →Demonstrated
Working methods and analytical tools connect project, procurement, counterparty and public records, surface review questions, trace analysis to evidence and support expert judgment.
Being strengthened
Broader source coverage, secure analytical environments, quality assurance, specialist review capacity and operating procedures for institutional engagements.
Longer-term direction
Independent intelligence and decision support for institutions, alongside public-interest research and analysis where broader disclosure advances transparency or accountability.
Interactive workflow
See how a signal becomes a reviewable question.
Select a cell in the matrix to move from a portfolio pattern to the project, review question, and source records behind it.
Try the workflowSelect any colored cell. The project panel updates with why it surfaced, what a reviewer would examine next, and the evidence trail behind it.
Evidence-led reviewWhere review signals concentrate
Interactive · select a cellSelect a review state below. The detail panel updates immediately.
Region ARegion BRegion CRegion D
Energy·
Adaptation
Forestry··
Coastal resilience·
Standard reviewMonitorEnhanced review
What this showsHow a portfolio pattern leads to the project, review question, and source records behind it.
Why it mattersIt helps a reviewer focus professional attention where the evidence warrants a closer look.
How to read itPriority directs attention. Conclusions follow from the underlying evidence, context, and expert assessment.
Who it is for
Different mandates. One connected evidence base.
The same evidence base can support climate funds, development banks, donor governments, oversight bodies, implementers, researchers, and civil society. Each user retains the judgment and authority that comes with its mandate.
Governments, climate authorities and funders
Support project review, due diligence, portfolio monitoring and risk prioritization with connected evidence and counterparty context.
- Project and portfolio analysis
- Due diligence and counterparty context
- Evidence-based decision support
Oversight, integrity and accountability bodies
Organize project, procurement, entity and public records for qualified audit, assurance, preventive integrity, investigation and accountability review.
- Audit and assurance
- Integrity and investigations
- Parliamentary and public oversight
Public-interest users
Support research, journalism, and civil-society accountability with traceable project-level and systemic evidence.
- Evidence-based inquiries
- Longitudinal research
- Public accountability
Start a conversation
Better decisions begin with a clearer record.
Climate Probity provides independent intelligence and analysis across climate and development finance to help users understand the record, identify material risks, and make better-informed decisions.